Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Marveling at Superheroes

     The final mini-essay for the Study of the Novel course at Rogers State University during the Spring 2015 semester. We were supposed to give a quick recap of a novel from the last fifteen years and recap the main course concepts.

      What I chose for this project was a 2008 graphic novel called Marvels, which is a Marvel Comics collection of a 1994 comic-book miniseries of the same name written by Kurt Busiek and illustrated by Alex Ross.
     The plot follows the life and career of everyday photojournalist Phil Sheldon while he tries to come to terms with what it means to live an ordinary life in a world filled with incredibly-gifted people, set against the semi-seen background of the biggest events of Marvel Comics' history. He also struggles with how to best take care of his family; observes how society ought to and does in fact act towards heroes; battles the human instinct of prejudice, and ponders what our reaction should be when our heroes fail us.
     The story is told through first-person perspective, mostly through Phil's eyes, but it opens in the eyes of the original android Human Torch, seeking an escape from a prison which society placed him/it into, much like Meursault in Camus' Stranger. Like many of the protagonists in the novels we've studied this semester, the Torch comes to a moment of individual realization. This realization leads to a breakout that changes Phil's life, and all of New York, forever - signaling the dawn of the superhero era. "Their faces told a different story - A story of fear and awe, and a world cut loose from its moorings" (Busiek). Change is terrifying, and so is uncertainty. Then World War II added its anxieties and pressures onto life, but also (in this world) gave us Captain Americac. His actions against the Nazis, along with the Human Torch and the Sub-Mariner, changed public opinion into supporting these gifted "Marvels", as Phil terms them, as heroes. But then came the X-Men and mutants. It is unclear exactly what they are supposed to represent, so that can be interpreted as teen alienation, racism, homophobia, Communism or religious intolerance, to name a few. It was the 60's, there was a lot going on. They are different, and that can lead to irrational hate on both sides. Gabriel's attitude towards whites in Baldwin's Go Tell It On the Mountain and the town's attitude towards Sula are good examples (Baldwin 34, Morrison 122). This tension leads to wild rioting in the streets: "They weren't thinking. They were just afraid and angry, and they were lashing out" (Busiek). Phil comes to realize that though the mutants are very different, they are still people and ought to be treated like it. A comparison would be Craig's contact with Raina's family in Blankets (Thompson 233-242).
     After having their world saved from an enormous calamity yet again, Phil thinks that people ought to be grateful. But instead: "The whole city seemed embarrassed, somehow - ashamed of their terror, now that it was over and they were still alive" (Busiek). And to conceal that terror, people blame the heroes. But yet they remain, not trying to win the approval of the "petty and small-minded", but to protect those everyday citizens, those innocents (Busiek). Phil is haunted by Gwen Stacy's death, feeling betrayed by Spider-Man's failure to save her. He retires, disgusted and worn out with following the exploits of the Marvels. But our heroes are human, too; as Marianne found out about Willoughby, Nick discovered about Gatsby, or Craig realized about Raina (Austen 152-164; Fitzgerald 64; Thompson 520-527). Even though they inevitably fall short, we still hold them high as examples because they give us hope. And as long as we have hope, we an keep going about whatever our mundane tasks are, with our heads held a little higher and our stamina increased to where we can hang on a second longer.
     Though graphic novels are still seen as having an aura of being disreputable, the format is evolving much like the novel did - beginning with something paint-by-numbers simplicity but gradually diving into deeper themes about this life, in addition to wrestling with questions of critiquing society and experimenting with perspectives and choice of narrators. And superheroes fight our tendency towards cynicism by reminding us that basic concepts like right and wrong are concrete; not relative. These stories can run across the near-infinite pathways of human experience. At the end of the day, we need that reminder.

WORKS CITED
Austen, Jane. Sense and Sensibility. 1811. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Print.

Baldwin, James. Go Tell It On the Mountain. 1952. New York: Vintage International, 2013. Print.

Busiek, Kurt. Marvels. Illus. Alex Ross. January-April 1994. New York: Marvel Publishing, 2008. Print.

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. 1925. New York: Scribner, 2004. Print.

Morrison, Toni. Sula. 1973. New York: Vintage International, 2004. Print.

Thompson, Craig. Blankets. Marietta, Georgia: Top Shelf Productions, 2003. Print. 
    

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Religion and the Church in the Modern Novel

     File under "I Don't Stay Within Lines Very Well" when it comes to school stuff...the thinking-box you're expected to stay in breaks easily. This was for a Study of the Novel at Rogers State University.

     "One of the themes in most, though not all, of the novels discussed in during class this semester has been the importance (or lack) of religion in the main characters’ lives. Except for Sense and Sensibility and The Great Gatsby, I think every other novel studied has had an element of religion in some way or another.
Craig Thompson in Blankets, Stephen Dedalus in James Joyce’s Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man and Edna Pontellier in Kate Chopin’s Awakening all explicitly reject the church while chasing their artistic dreams (Thompson 545-560; Joyce 174-79; Chopin 30). There are positive portrayals of faith in Albert Camus’ Stranger in the forms of the magistrate and the priest (Camus 66-71, 115-122). The Sun Also Rises, by Ernest Hemingway, has rare but profound moments focusing on the church and religion; most characters share Harris’s sentiment that cathedrals may be remarkable, but “[he’s] not much on those type of places” (Hemingway 133). Jake admits that though he is a rotten Catholic, and it was a grand religion, maybe he would do better next time (Hemingway 103). For the black communities in James Baldwin’s Go Tell It On the Mountain and Toni Morrison’s Sula, the local church and God are as much a part of life as food, sex and death (Morrison 90). Further, the residents of the Bottom let nothing keep them from their God (Morrison 150).
     Given the Soviet-controlled setting of Czechoslovakia at the time of Milan Kundera’s Unbearable Lightness of Being, it is understandable that religion would not figure much of a role in characters’ lives. Tomas is skeptical of his son Simon’s faith, seeing believers as “clairvoyants” and wondering whether Simon “joined the church to oppose the regime or if he really believes in God” (Kundera 310). However, the narrator does mention Biblical passages throughout the work, such as Moses’ rescue from the river, Jesus’ crucifixion and the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 1:28, Adam and Eve were told to “Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves along the ground” (New International Version). Tereza is following that command in taking care of the heifers and as she and Tomas are dealing with Karenin’s death (Kundera 284-303). Why does Karenin’s death have such an impact on us as readers? As the narrator states, “animals were not expelled from Paradise” (Kundera 298). As such, they can love with “a completely selfless love”, without asking for anything in return (Kundera 297). The narrator talks quite a lot about lightness or weight; never really coming to a satisfactory conclusion about which is better. Philosopher G.K. Chesterton explains his views on this matter in an essay entitled “The Eternal Revolution”, from his 1908 book Orthodoxy. The pride of the Fall results in a selfish seriousness, while it takes effort to reach a happy self-forgetfulness (Chesterton 128). Dogs accomplish this naturally; which is why we love them so much. As Chesterton writes, “It is much easier to write a good Times leading article than it is to write a good joke in Punch. For solemnity flows out of men naturally; but laughter is a leap. It is easy to be heavy; hard to be light.” (128). As Ralph C. Wood writes in his article “Orthodoxy at a Hundred”, Chesterton “treats the most serious things in the lightest manner, probing depths when he appears to be skating on surfaces” (Wood 40).
     The Sun Also Rises and Blankets both quote from Ecclesiastes several times, Sun takes its title and theme from Ecc. 1:4-7, which also serves the book’s preface. Craig stumbles over Ecc. 2:22-24 and 5:19, not understanding the context surrounding those verses (Thompson 546-551). In those pages his pastor suggests that the Bible needs a “growth process”, which Craig is rightfully horrified by. Ideally, he would have turned to 1 Timothy 3:16-17 in response, but instead his faith crumbles and he moves to Milwaukee as soon as possible (Thompson 551). Because of the natural solemnity of mankind and our colossal insignificance as created beings (Job 38:4-40:2), as Solomon noted, our days are “meaningless, chasing after the wind” (Ecc. 2:11). Hemingway’s characters understood this, as Jig in his short story “Hills Like White Elephants” comments that “everything tastes of licorice” (Fifth Column 372).
     Morrison’s novel Sula details very strange occurrences in an offhand manner, much like most events in the book of Genesis. Eva’s burning of Plum is similar to Cain’s murder of Abel (Morrison 45-48, Genesis 4:2-16). Carolyn M. Jones, in an essay for Indiana State University’s African American Review, writes that Cain sinned, yes, but more than that, he refused to mourn for the harm his sin caused on others. At Chicken Little’s funeral, Nel tries to justify to herself that she had “done nothing” to bring about his death, and the black people do not feel the victim was Chicken; rather, they felt themselves the victim (Morrison 65). Eva later says Nel and Sula are just alike, “never was no difference between you” (Morrison 169). Sula also wandered like Cain, but neither was killed by the hands of others.
     The characters in Baldwin’s book are hypocrites; it’s a very ironical novel. As Florence tells Gabriel, “You better stop trying to blame everything on Elizabeth and look to your own wrongdoings” (Baldwin 48). In Part Two, “The Prayers of the Saints”, while the characters are supposedly in prayer, they’re really thinking of their histories, which is how we as readers learn the family’s backstory. Sally Higbee wrote in her critical response to the book: “I’m thinking, ‘Wait a minute…this doesn’t sound like a prayer!’…I realized that I pray in a very similar fashion…The actual prayer is composed of story…My heart cries out as I experience these stories” (Higbee 51). This seems like an accurate, if uncomfortable to consider, human reaction. John has his spiritual experience, yes, but it feels inauthentic (Baldwin 224-263). There is too much irony, hopelessness and destruction with good intentions laden throughout the tale that we are more inclined to believe that his thoughts in the city, “If it’s wrong, I can always climb back up”, are more honest in speaking of his end, because “these glories were unimaginable – but the city was real” (Baldwin 32). In an article for The Classical Teacher, Martin Cothran explains what such irony does to students and audiences: Students no longer believe stories told at face value, because it seems too idealistic and unsophisticated to do so (Cothran 51). Cothran then goes on to explain that irony has been around since the Greek dramatists, only that irony – both destructive and sympathetic forms – were subordinate to the epics of Homer, which had no irony at all. If everything has a hidden meaning, there can no longer be a hero, which is disheartening. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings is, according to Cothran, the only epic literature in the last hundred years, “and the only reason it exists in the modern world at all is because it is not modern. It is of another time – a time in which greatness was acknowledged” (Cothran 53).
     Because of this attitude towards life, where nothing is absolute, there are few things seen as sacred and everything can be seen through, I would say that accounts for the rather negative-to-ambivalent portrayal of religion and the church that is common in most modern novels. There are exceptions, such as superhero films, that still promote heroism and taking events at face value, but they are rare. There are ways to combat this attitude, but that would be material for another paper. For now, for the first steps in righting this viewpoint, the best advice I have is suggest studying Chesterton’s essay, also found in Orthodoxy, entitled “The Ethics of Elfland”, on the power and vital importance of fairy tales."     



Works Cited
Baldwin, James. Go Tell It On the Mountain. 1952. New York: Vintage International, 2013. Print. 
The Holy Bible, New International Version. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Bible Publishers, 1978. Print.
Camus, Albert. The Stranger. 1942. Trans. Matthew Ward. New York: Vintage International, 1989. Print.
Chopin, Kate. The Awakening. 1899. New York: Avon Books, 1972. Print.
Chesterton, G.K. “The Eternal Revolution”, Orthodoxy. 1908. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1995. Print.
Cothran, Martin. “The ‘Demon Irony’.” The Classical Teacher, Memoria Press. Late Summer 2014. pp 50-53. Web. 20 April 2015.
Higbee, Sally. “A Reader’s Response to Go Tell It On the Mountain.” The Oswald Review: An International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Criticism in the Discipline of English. 2:1 (1 January 2000) pp 49-56. University of South Carolina. Web. 20 April 2015.   
Hemingway, Ernest. “Hills Like White Elephants”, The Fifth Column and the First Forty-Nine Stories, 1927. New York: Scribner, 1938. Print.
----------------, The Sun Also Rises. 1926. New York: Scribner, 2006. Print.
Jones, Carolyn M. “Sula and Beloved: Images of Cain in the Novels of Toni Morrison”. African American Review. 27:4 (Winter 1993): pp 615-626. Web. 19 April 2015.
Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. 1914. New York: Penguin Books, 1993. Print. 
Morrison, Toni. Sula. 1973. New York: Vintage International, 2004. Print.
Thompson, Craig. Blankets. Marietta, Georgia: Top Shelf Productions. 2003. Print.

Wood, Ralph C. “Orthodoxy at a Hundred”. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life. 187(2008). pp 39-43. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 April 2015. 

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Short-Story Critique - The Story of an Hour

     For Creative Writing at Rogers State. I was worn out by this point, and I hate Kate Chopin's writing, but was familiar with this story  So this critique is a little lame, but it was for speed, get it in by deadline.

            The story I chose to look for this week’s assignment is “The Story of an Hour”, by Kate Chopin, originally written in 1894, which I found on pages 83-86 of Penguin’s Fiction: A Pocket Anthology.
            There has been a railway accident and Brently Mallard has been reportedly killed. His repressed wife Louise is predictably hysterical at first, but then goes upstairs to grieve by herself. Instead of truly grieving she thinks about the future, thrilled that the shackles of marriage no longer bind her. Brently walks in from the office, he was far away from the scene of the accident. In dismay and shock, Louise dies of a heart attack.
            While I feel sorry for Chopin’s life, the struggle she endured to get published and raise her children at the same time, I don’t particularly care for Chopin’s writing, as I find her characters too feministic, violently angry and incredibly selfish. And the poetical abstractions sprinkled heavily throughout her prose are hard to follow. However, I do really like the sentence “…Josephine told her, in broken sentences, veiled hints that revealed in half concealing.” That says a lot about how language actually works, both in life and literature.
            The theme seems to be about freedom; how monstrous it can be by itself. Relationships bring restraints by necessity in order to function; and as humans we must have relationships in order to survive. Brently’s presumed death left Louise on her own, which was exhilarating and allowed her to fly like Icarus. The joy was too much.